Tuesday, December 3, 2013
Jill Lepore on the Difficulty of Writing about Subordinated Subjects
In a recent interview about her new book on Benjamin Franklin’s sister, Harvard history professor and New Yorker staff writer Jill Lepore talked about the difficulty of writing appealing narrative about historical figures whose life stories contain many negative markers such as personal tragedy, defeat, oppression, exclusion and/or discrimination and, concomitantly, a drastic failure to achieve to potential. In fact, Lepore talks about putting her project on Jane Franklin aside for years because of this problem, until she finally figured out a brilliant way to avoid turning off her readers by starting her story centuries before and ending it centuries after Jane Franklin’s life. After struggling with writing Defining the Struggle, a narrative about late nineteenth and early twentieth century racial justice advocates and the many defeats and often related personal tragedies they faced, I very much identified with Lepore’s problem and was thrilled to find her interview (pointed out to me by my colleague Robert Tsai). Unlike Lepore, however, I never found a brilliant solution. Here are two examples I really struggled with: T. Thomas Fortune -- a law-trained journalist who founded the National Afro American League -- envisioned the founding platform the early NAACP would take up decades later; I like to describe him as the most important early civil rights leader no one in legal academia has heard of. But the story of Fortune’s life trajectory is not a narratively appealing one. Fortune started his adult life full of vision and positive energy, but in mid-life he fell under Booker T. Washington’s influence, in part because he was in desperate financial straits. Washington stole Fortune’s newspaper from him and booted him out onto the street; Fortune had a nervous breakdown and became an irascible, erratic contributor of occasional articles, finishing the last half his life with a greatly diminished stature as compared to his younger self. It occurs to me that part of why he is not well remembered today is that his life story does not form an attractive, coherent narrative arc. It is hard to lionize someone whose life became such a mess after a relatively short period of early accomplishment. My second example is even more tragic. It involves the Niagara Movement’s only test case plaintiff, Barbara E. Pope. Pope was a talented literary writer and left wonderful historical evidence of her views in gems such as a short story in which an African American woman and her husband, a lawyer, argue about whether she should fulfill her strong ambition to become a lawyer. Her husband wins the argument. Given my interest in women’s quasi-legal reform activism, I even thought about starting my book with Pope. But featuring Pope became very problematic once I discovered that she had committed suicide several years after a jury returned an insulting verdict in her test case, awarding her only one cent in damages for the dignitary rights violation of being thrown off a Jim Crow train and forcibly arrested. I did put all this information into the book, of course, but could not start with it; who wants to read a book that starts with such a sad tale. A host of other important figures had similarly tragic stories; racial justice activism in the nadir period was a hugely draining, personally taxing endeavor that quite literally destroyed people’s lives. I am wondering if others have faced similar problems and what solutions, if any, they found to them.
Posted by Susan D. Carle at 2:00 AM